-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add jailer bind mounts integration test #1099
Labels
Good first issue
Indicates a good issue for first-time contributors
Priority: Low
Indicates that an issue or pull request should be resolved behind issues or pull requests labelled `
Status: Parked
Indicates that an issues or pull request will be revisited later
Type: Enhancement
Indicates new feature requests
Comments
anthonycorletti
added a commit
to anthonycorletti/firecracker
that referenced
this issue
Feb 3, 2025
anthonycorletti
added a commit
to anthonycorletti/firecracker
that referenced
this issue
Feb 3, 2025
anthonycorletti
added a commit
to anthonycorletti/firecracker
that referenced
this issue
Feb 3, 2025
anthonycorletti
added a commit
to anthonycorletti/firecracker
that referenced
this issue
Feb 4, 2025
anthonycorletti
added a commit
to anthonycorletti/firecracker
that referenced
this issue
Feb 4, 2025
10 tasks
anthonycorletti
added a commit
to anthonycorletti/firecracker
that referenced
this issue
Feb 11, 2025
anthonycorletti
added a commit
to anthonycorletti/firecracker
that referenced
this issue
Feb 11, 2025
…: Anthony Corletti <[email protected]>
anthonycorletti
added a commit
to anthonycorletti/firecracker
that referenced
this issue
Feb 11, 2025
…ating mounts for the guest kernel and rootfs and mounting them to the jailer root as mentioned in firecracker-microvm#1089 Signed-off-by: Anthony Corletti <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Good first issue
Indicates a good issue for first-time contributors
Priority: Low
Indicates that an issue or pull request should be resolved behind issues or pull requests labelled `
Status: Parked
Indicates that an issues or pull request will be revisited later
Type: Enhancement
Indicates new feature requests
We should add an integration test to cover similar use cases as those mentioned in #1089. We can use this branch as a starting point, after harmonizing it with the latest version of #1093 (ideally by dropping the cherry picked commit at the end, and rebasing master after it gets merged).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: