Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TASK [Check latest available OpenShift RPM version] Could not parse metalink #15040

Closed
0xmichalis opened this issue Jul 5, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed
Labels
area/tests kind/test-flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to test flakes. priority/P3

Comments

@0xmichalis
Copy link
Contributor

0xmichalis commented Jul 5, 2017


TASK [Check latest available OpenShift RPM version] ****************************
task path: /usr/share/ansible/openshift-ansible/playbooks/common/openshift-cluster/upgrades/pre/verify_upgrade_targets.yml:16
fatal: [localhost]: FAILED! => {
    "changed": false, 
    "failed": true, 
    "generated_timestamp": "2017-07-04 16:15:55.100249", 
    "msg": {
        "cmd": "/usr/bin/repoquery --plugins --quiet --pkgnarrow=repos --queryformat=%{version}|%{release}|%{arch}|%{repo}|%{version}-%{release} --config=/tmp/tmp4WjReN origin", 
        "package_found": false, 
        "results": {}, 
        "returncode": 1, 
        "stderr": "Repository centos-openshift-origin is listed more than once in the configuration\nRepository centos-openshift-origin-testing is listed more than once in the configuration\nRepository centos-openshift-origin-debuginfo is listed more than once in the configuration\nRepository centos-openshift-origin-source is listed more than once in the configuration\nFile /var/cache/yum/x86_64/7Server/epel/metalink.xml does not exist\n", 
        "stdout": "Could not parse metalink https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-7&arch=x86_64 error was \nNo timestamp for file\n"
    }
}
 [WARNING]: Could not create retry file '/usr/share/ansible/openshift-
ansible/playbooks/byo/openshift-cluster/upgrades/v3_6/upgrade.retry'.
[Errno 13] Permission denied: u'/usr/share/ansible/openshift-
ansible/playbooks/byo/openshift-cluster/upgrades/v3_6/upgrade.retry'

PLAY RECAP *********************************************************************
localhost                  : ok=127  changed=5    unreachable=0    failed=1   

++ export status=FAILURE
++ status=FAILURE
+ set +o xtrace
########## FINISHED STAGE: FAILURE: UPDATE ORIGIN TO RELEASE [00h 01m 15s] ##########

https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/merge_pull_request_origin/1227/consoleFull#32866359658b6e51eb7608a5981914356
@stevekuznetsov @sdodson

@0xmichalis 0xmichalis added area/tests kind/test-flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to test flakes. priority/P1 labels Jul 5, 2017
@stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Contributor

It's a Could not parse metalink error. Nothing we can do about it.

@stevekuznetsov stevekuznetsov changed the title FAILURE: UPDATE ORIGIN TO RELEASE TASK [Check latest available OpenShift RPM version] Could not parse metalink Jul 5, 2017
@0xmichalis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@stevekuznetsov is this tracked elsewhere?

@0xmichalis 0xmichalis reopened this Jul 5, 2017
@stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Contributor

#8571 is similar and links some other related issues but this may be nice to keep open for:

  • the customer success team @rhcarvalho @sosiouxme to track their check
  • for other devs to find this more easily when their jobs fail

@sosiouxme
Copy link
Member

This is a random failure while running a repoquery command, not a formal check. But you could run into something like this almost anywhere you hit yum. I've opened openshift/openshift-ansible#4686 as a suggestion for improvement.

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Feb 2, 2018

closing in deference to openshift/openshift-ansible#4686

@bparees bparees closed this as completed Feb 2, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/tests kind/test-flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to test flakes. priority/P3
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants