-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test_pull_request_origin_unit
sometimes fails without an explanation or (obvious) reason
#18497
Comments
/cc @stevekuznetsov |
/cc @mfojtik |
Yeah, I've noticed this as well but wasn't really sure what to do here... the process had no output to |
Not really sure what that could be, I guess we hide the error somewhere. Can we run with |
We could but not sure that would help, the https://github.com/openshift/origin/blob/master/hack/test-go.sh#L140 |
For some reason that error file is empty in jenkins artifacts. My thinking was that we would see the exact command that failed as well as its arguments; might help to uncover whatever is causing the flake, or not. |
It is empty because |
badly phrased; meant the same thing. The question is why there is no error output but exit status 2.
|
See also #17881 |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle rotten |
/close |
It says:
Started to see this here https://openshift-gce-devel.appspot.com/build/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/18495/test_pull_request_origin_unit/9196/
Went through the S3 artifacts but couldn't see what failed :/ (Apparently something in the test image does.)
The I saw the same just now with https://openshift-gce-devel.appspot.com/build/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/18495/test_pull_request_origin_unit/9196/ from https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/18495/files which is very unlikely to make unit tests not to compile given how the change is small and where it's located.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: