Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[test-infra-definitions][automated] Bump test-infra-definitions to 22b9ecc329e6ec7180acc10b26a520255ce0b3d6 #34298

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

agent-platform-auto-pr[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

This PR was automatically created by the test-infra-definitions bump task.

This PR bumps the test-infra-definitions submodule to 22b9ecc329e6ec7180acc10b26a520255ce0b3d6 from e794a84e6a0b.
Here is the full changelog between the two commits: DataDog/test-infra-definitions@e794a84...22b9ecc

⚠️ This PR is opened with the qa/no-code-change and changelog/no-changelog labels by default. Please make sure this is appropriate

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor Author

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Feb 21, 2025

[Fast Unit Tests Report]

On pipeline 56553298 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:

Jobs:
  • tests_windows-x64

If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor Author

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Feb 21, 2025

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor fc9d875e3825f654a5c6b9beb664cae415198ee0

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 869.25MB 869.25MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 879.02MB 879.02MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 879.02MB 879.02MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 858.56MB 858.56MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 868.31MB 868.31MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 41.40MB 41.40MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 41.48MB 41.48MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 41.48MB 41.48MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 39.66MB 39.66MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 446.32MB 446.32MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 62.02MB 62.02MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 62.09MB 62.09MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 62.09MB 62.09MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 59.26MB 59.26MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 59.33MB 59.33MB 0.50MB

Decision

✅ Passed

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor Author

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Feb 21, 2025

Static quality checks ✅

Please find below the results from static quality gates

Successful checks

Info

Result Quality gate On disk size On disk size limit On wire size On wire size limit
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_amd64 840.34MiB 847.49MiB 203.08MiB 212.33MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_arm64 830.12MiB 836.66MiB 183.65MiB 192.5MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_amd64 840.33MiB 847.82MiB 205.97MiB 215.76MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_arm64 830.11MiB 836.66MiB 185.38MiB 194.24MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_amd64 840.33MiB 847.82MiB 205.97MiB 215.76MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_arm64 830.11MiB 836.66MiB 185.38MiB 194.24MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_amd64 39.56MiB 49.7MiB 10.55MiB 20.6MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_arm64 37.9MiB 48.1MiB 9.13MiB 19.1MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 39.56MiB 49.7MiB 10.56MiB 20.6MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_suse_amd64 39.56MiB 49.7MiB 10.56MiB 20.6MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_amd64 59.22MiB 69.0MiB 14.88MiB 24.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_arm64 56.59MiB 66.4MiB 12.82MiB 22.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_amd64 59.22MiB 69.0MiB 14.9MiB 24.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_arm64 56.59MiB 66.4MiB 12.85MiB 22.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_suse_amd64 59.22MiB 69.0MiB 14.9MiB 24.8MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_amd64 925.11MiB 931.7MiB 309.15MiB 318.67MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_arm64 938.17MiB 944.08MiB 294.15MiB 303.0MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_amd64 1.1GiB 1.1GiB 384.27MiB 393.75MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_arm64 1.1GiB 1.1GiB 365.23MiB 373.71MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_amd64 47.7MiB 57.88MiB 18.26MiB 28.29MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_arm64 46.09MiB 56.27MiB 17.02MiB 27.06MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_amd64 264.95MiB 274.78MiB 106.33MiB 116.28MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_arm64 280.92MiB 290.82MiB 101.17MiB 111.12MiB

Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Feb 21, 2025

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: c360b58c-8e60-4c29-831a-cc75de7c8e56

Baseline: fc9d875
Comparison: 4f38206
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
file_tree memory utilization +0.38 [+0.32, +0.43] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.08 [-0.70, +0.87] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.00 [-0.65, +0.66] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.30, +0.31] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.00 [-0.63, +0.63] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput -0.00 [-0.76, +0.76] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput -0.01 [-0.81, +0.80] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.84, +0.81] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.08 [-0.14, -0.01] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.10 [-0.15, -0.05] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.14 [-1.03, +0.75] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.18 [-0.64, +0.28] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.48 [-1.26, +0.29] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.60 [-0.64, -0.57] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -0.81 [-3.78, +2.16] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@KevinFairise2 KevinFairise2 requested review from a team as code owners February 21, 2025 12:59
@github-actions github-actions bot added medium review PR review might take time and removed short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Feb 21, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=56553298 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 4f38206

@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ func getDefaultProvisionerParams() *provisionerParams {
agentparams.WithSystemProbeConfig(defaultSysprobeConfig),
},
ami: gpuEnabledAMI,
amiOS: os.Ubuntu2204,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We're using a special AMI here for the GPU tests which is based on 22.04, I'm not sure if this should be changed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automatic/test-infra-bump changelog/no-changelog medium review PR review might take time qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants