Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 e2e/conversion: wrap create in eventually #2644

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2023

Conversation

ncdc
Copy link
Member

@ncdc ncdc commented Jan 18, 2023

Fixes #2643

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from davidfestal and kylape January 18, 2023 12:46
@ncdc
Copy link
Member Author

ncdc commented Jan 18, 2023

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 18, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ncdc

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 18, 2023
mapper.Reset()
framework.Eventually(t, func() (success bool, reason string) {
t.Logf("Resetting the RESTMapper so it can pick up widgets")
mapper.Reset()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

methods like mapper.RESTMapping used by helpers.CreateResourceFromFS will invalidate the mapper (mapper.Reset) but only when the underlying cache is not fresh. We could rely on it, wdyt?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That could work, but it won't work with a memCacheClient - you have to manually call reset.

@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 19, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 4506fdc into kcp-dev:main Jan 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

flake: TestAPIConversion
3 participants