Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Odom publishes apriori estimate? #142

Open
pratro opened this issue Feb 8, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Odom publishes apriori estimate? #142

pratro opened this issue Feb 8, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@pratro
Copy link

pratro commented Feb 8, 2025

Dear Koide3,

Is there a reason why the callback to on_new_frame happens before the fused estimate is computed? (before call to update_smoother)

Callbacks::on_new_frame(new_frame);

The transforms in the above frame passed to Callbacks:: contain only a forward propagation (till the current frame's timestamp) using IMU since the last frame's timestamp but the current frame's points (ICP factor), IMU factor and Bias aren't yet fused to provide a transform estimation. So only an apriori is published via this callback (that leads to odom publishing), is that interpretation correct?

Thank you

@koide3
Copy link
Owner

koide3 commented Feb 10, 2025

Your understanding is correct. The current implementation publishes the result of IMU-forward propagation as /glim_ros/odom. I expected it would be good for scenarios that require low-latency outputs (e.g., path planning) with reasonably small estimation drift.

Meanwhile, I'm thinking of implementing one more output topic to publish poses corrected by point cloud matching for people who need more precise pose outputs.

@pratro
Copy link
Author

pratro commented Feb 11, 2025

Thanks for your speedy response. I see. Yes a precise pose (posteriori) publisher is a great idea. Do you anticipate this could come without the latency penalty?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants