-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
emphasize deletion of all signatures if using invalid identity #10122
emphasize deletion of all signatures if using invalid identity #10122
Conversation
admin_guide/image_signatures.adoc
Outdated
Using the `--save` flag on already verified image together with invalid GPG key | ||
or invalid expected identity causes the saved verification status to be removed, | ||
and the image will become unverified. | ||
or invalid expected identity causes the saved verification status with all |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"with all" -> "and all"?
admin_guide/image_signatures.adoc
Outdated
or invalid expected identity causes the saved verification status to be removed, | ||
and the image will become unverified. | ||
or invalid expected identity causes the saved verification status with all | ||
previous signatures to be removed, and the image will become unverified. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
s/previous// ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
couldn't come up with any better adjective so I just removed the 'previous'
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sorry if it wasn't clear, that's exactly what i was suggesting you do :)
b37ceab
to
6f2d730
Compare
lgtm |
Thanks, @wozniakjan! LGTM. The bug attached to this is set for OCP 3.6, so is this applicable for 3.6+? No QE required. |
yes, 3.6+ |
Thanks! |
/cherrypick enterprise-3.7 |
@bmcelvee: new pull request created: #10403 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherrypick enterprise-3.9 |
@bmcelvee: new pull request created: #10404 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherrypick enterprise-3.10 |
@bmcelvee: new pull request created: #10405 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This is to supplement openshift/origin#19976, @bmcelvee in case you already created the PR we talked about, feel free to close this one. I was trying to find yours but couldn't and I had some spare time on Friday for this anyway :)
ptal @bmcelvee, @bparees