Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

resolve different etcd resource prefix for APIService objects #19949

Closed
liggitt opened this issue Jun 8, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

resolve different etcd resource prefix for APIService objects #19949

liggitt opened this issue Jun 8, 2018 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. kind/post-rebase lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. sig/master
Milestone

Comments

@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor

liggitt commented Jun 8, 2018

we are passing a different storage constructor that results in APIService objects being stored in a non-standard location in etcd

upstream: <prefix>/apiregistration.k8s.io/apiservices/...
origin: <prefix>/apiservices/...

@liggitt liggitt added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. kind/post-rebase sig/master priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. labels Jun 8, 2018
@liggitt liggitt added this to the v3.11 milestone Jun 8, 2018
@liggitt liggitt mentioned this issue Jun 8, 2018
51 tasks
@liggitt liggitt mentioned this issue Jun 27, 2018
17 tasks
@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor Author

liggitt commented Aug 30, 2018

/unassign

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 28, 2018
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Dec 28, 2018
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. kind/post-rebase lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. sig/master
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants