-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
1.3 crash picks #10526
1.3 crash picks #10526
Conversation
Protect access of the original writer. Panics if anything has wrote into the original writer or the writer is hijacked when times out.
The Pop method should allow a caller to requeue an item while under the fifo lock, to avoid races on deletes.
…ed as read-only. Send a node event when this happens and hint to the administrator about the remediation.
Previously it was trying to use a nil pod variable if error was returned from the pod update call. (note that the rest of 26680 is unit test related, and not picked here)
[test] |
With respect to the origin master HEAD (e5178ec): Only this one is not cherry-picked yet, the rest from Eric'c list is:
|
Evaluated for origin test up to b6e8f68 |
25308 isn't a clean cherry-pick because the history command has changed after 1.3. But we probably could massage it into our code. |
continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test FAILURE (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/8220/) |
All the picks look good to me. The pick for 29672 is good, but I could not see what underlying issue it fixed, seemed like a change to just code hygiene since there was no reference to a material panic it prevented. |
$ goroutine 111 [running]: |
So "UPSTREAM: 29743: Fix race condition found in JitterUntil" is the culprit |
Putting the Works for containerized world. So either put back the call or skip the cherry-pick as @derekwaynecarr suggests. |
Isn't this actually exposing a real issue though? /cc @liggitt |
@ingvagabund Given where we are at in the release cycle think putting it back in makes sense, but imho we need to re-eval in the next cycle issues we are actually glossing over. |
@timothysc - I agree it could cover a real issue, I have decided to carry a patch that keeps handle crash, and we can open an issue to evaluate that carry after release. see #10541 |
closing in favor of #10541 |
Cherry picks of
for #9790 (comment)
cc @smarterclayton @eparis @timothysc @sttts @ingvagabund @derekwaynecarr @pmorie