Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deploy: correct updating lastTransitionTime in deployment conditions #11665

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2016
Merged

deploy: correct updating lastTransitionTime in deployment conditions #11665

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2016

Conversation

0xmichalis
Copy link
Contributor

@0xmichalis
Copy link
Contributor Author

[test]

// Note that LastTransitionTime stays the same.
LastTransitionTime: now,
// Only the reason changes.
Reason: "BecauseItIs",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lol :-)

@mfojtik mfojtik added this to the 1.4.0 milestone Oct 31, 2016
@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor

mfojtik commented Oct 31, 2016

LGTM

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin test up to c22bf4f

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM [merge] thanks

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin merge up to c22bf4f

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/10858/) (Base Commit: 4ce8863)

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Nov 1, 2016

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/10897/) (Base Commit: 63642d6) (Image: devenv-rhel7_5284)

@openshift-bot openshift-bot merged commit eb597fe into openshift:master Nov 1, 2016
@0xmichalis 0xmichalis deleted the fix-lastTransitionTime-updates branch November 1, 2016 09:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants