Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

prove the clientbuilder works with RC controller #14033

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 10, 2017

Conversation

deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

@deads2k deads2k commented May 3, 2017

This pull plumbs in the client builder and controller initializer to our kube launch to start using the upstream roles and bindings.

@liggitt fyi
@enj please review

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented May 4, 2017

[test]

@mfojtik mfojtik added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 4, 2017
@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor

mfojtik commented May 4, 2017

(approved means we want to get this in during the dcut as we want to fix our controller roles using this approach instead of fiddling the existing bootstrap policy)

@deads2k deads2k force-pushed the auth-13-client-builder branch 2 times, most recently from c13c564 to aa4563b Compare May 4, 2017 17:47
@sttts sttts mentioned this pull request May 5, 2017
32 tasks
@deads2k deads2k force-pushed the auth-13-client-builder branch from aa4563b to d700ea8 Compare May 5, 2017 16:46
@deads2k deads2k force-pushed the auth-13-client-builder branch from d700ea8 to 8d0fa1c Compare May 8, 2017 13:00
@openshift-bot openshift-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 8, 2017
@deads2k deads2k force-pushed the auth-13-client-builder branch from 8d0fa1c to 3928ecb Compare May 8, 2017 18:35
@openshift-bot openshift-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 8, 2017
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented May 9, 2017

@mfojtik @soltysh Could you take a look? The upstreams are already merged.

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented May 10, 2017

bump

)
}

// GetDeadClusterRoles returns
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

returns dead cluster roles?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

returns dead cluster roles?

Fixed

@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor

mfojtik commented May 10, 2017

LGTM

@deads2k guess the next step is to migrate over rest of the upstream controllers?

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented May 10, 2017

@deads2k guess the next step is to migrate over rest of the upstream controllers?

Yes. In progress as we speak

@deads2k deads2k force-pushed the auth-13-client-builder branch from 3928ecb to ba8eba7 Compare May 10, 2017 14:33
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented May 10, 2017

[merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin merge up to ba8eba7

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin test up to ba8eba7

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin/1306/) (Base Commit: 31caa0d)

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 10, 2017

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/merge_pull_request_origin/602/) (Base Commit: 2d26eae) (Image: devenv-rhel7_6225)

@deads2k deads2k deleted the auth-13-client-builder branch August 3, 2017 19:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants