Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rebase to kube 1.7 on master #15234

Merged
merged 87 commits into from
Jul 19, 2017
Merged

rebase to kube 1.7 on master #15234

merged 87 commits into from
Jul 19, 2017

Conversation

deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

@deads2k deads2k commented Jul 17, 2017

Rebase branch on master. Original review of all commits completed in #15100

[test]

@deads2k deads2k mentioned this pull request Jul 17, 2017
9 tasks
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jul 17, 2017

I think the last bit of outstanding work is to open the upstream commits.

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jul 17, 2017

@eparis @sttts @liggitt @smarterclayton Holy crap, fully reviewed and green! merge it quick!

https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin/3203/

@enj
Copy link
Contributor

enj commented Jul 17, 2017

scared

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Jul 17, 2017

[testextended][extended:core(builds|templates)]

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

smarterclayton commented Jul 17, 2017 via email

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Jul 17, 2017

@stevekuznetsov err:

+ make test-extended 'SUITE=core(templates),core' FOCUS=builds
test/extended/core(templates),core.sh --ginkgo.focus="builds"
/bin/sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected token `templates'
/bin/sh: -c: line 0: `test/extended/core(templates),core.sh --ginkgo.focus="builds"'

?

i'm going to just run one and then the other, but it seems like rosie didn't combine the focuses properly.

@openshift openshift deleted a comment from openshift-bot Jul 17, 2017
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jul 17, 2017

@smarterclayton I'd rather not. This is green and trying to manually determine if their code can/should merge on mine isn't good from a review or stability perspective.

People can create their own branches from here for merge after this. We could also move the branch up. I don't want to become Rosie on a psuedo-fork that periodically gets to rebase everyone's pulls on a new head. It's hard enough keeping this up to date already

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

smarterclayton commented Jul 17, 2017 via email

@openshift-bot openshift-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 17, 2017
@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Jul 18, 2017

The BuildConfig "sample-build" is invalid: 
* spec.source.git.httpproxy: Invalid value: "127.0.0.1:3128": proxy is not a valid url
* spec.source.git.httpsproxy: Invalid value: "127.0.0.1:3128": proxy is not a valid url

@jim-minter looks like we have another case of using url parse that has been broken by golang 1.8. Think you can throw together a commit for @deads2k to cherry-pick here?

(https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin_extended/863/)

e.serverThresholdCurrent.Set(float64(servers))
e.serverThresholdLimit.Set(float64(e.opts.ServerThreshold))
// TODO counters only go up
// e.serverThresholdCurrent.Set(float64(servers))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can just make these gauges

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Saw this in the logs:

W0718 03:42:32.685569   20120 reflector.go:323] github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/informers/informers_generated/externalversions/factory.go:72: watch of *v1beta1.ThirdPartyResource ended with: etcdserver: mvcc: required revision has been compacted

GC or lost Mo's "disable TPR controller" commit?

@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor

liggitt commented Jul 18, 2017

W0718 03:42:32.685569 20120 reflector.go:323] github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/informers/informers_generated/externalversions/factory.go:72: watch of *v1beta1.ThirdPartyResource ended with: etcdserver: mvcc: required revision has been compacted

could also be storage cacher... not sure

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

How are you tracking post-rebase (so I can add things)

@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Jul 18, 2017

@smarterclayton post rebase todos: #14647

@deads2k deads2k mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2017
@stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Contributor

@bparees that logic lives here

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jul 18, 2017

Opened a PR for etcd

It didn't build. I've opened #15313 and I'll keep chasing it.

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jul 18, 2017

[test]

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jul 18, 2017

All the upstream 00000's have associated pulls.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin testextended up to 7d969d4

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin test up to 7d969d4

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jul 18, 2017

I kicked a few jobs for flake handling:

Overall: green!

  1. https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin/3233/
    check failed on flake: TestStoreWatch panicked  #13068
    integration green
    networking green
    gce failed on yum
    conformance green
  2. https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin/3234/
    check green
    integration green
    networking green
    gce failed on yum
    conformance failed on Extended.deploymentconfigs with revision history limits [Conformance] should never persist more old deployments than acceptable after being observed by the controller #11114
  3. https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin/3235/
    check failed on 'oc get netnamespace default -o jsonpath=
    integration flaked on Flake: github.com/openshift/origin/test/end-to-end/core.test/end-to-end/core.sh:389 #14897
    networking green
    gce green
    conformance green
  4. https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin/3236/ green
    check green
    integration green
    networking green
    gce green
    conformance green

@openshift-bot openshift-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 18, 2017
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin/3233/) (Base Commit: 20e72f7) (PR Branch Commit: 7d969d4)

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/testextended FAILURE (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin_extended/868/) (Base Commit: 20e72f7) (PR Branch Commit: 7d969d4) (Extended Tests: core(builds|templates))

@liggitt liggitt merged commit a5f7000 into openshift:master Jul 19, 2017
@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Jul 19, 2017

🎉

@deads2k deads2k deleted the rebase-02-0717 branch August 3, 2017 19:27
juanvallejo added a commit to juanvallejo/origin that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2017
Picked commit from rebase to kube 1.7
Commit: cb0c13a
PR: openshift#15234
juanvallejo added a commit to juanvallejo/origin that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2017
Picked commit from rebase PR to kube 1.7
Commit: f39394b: handle printer changes
PR: openshift#15234
juanvallejo added a commit to juanvallejo/origin that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2017
Picked commit from rebase PR to kube 1.7
Commit: f39394b: handle printer changes
PR: openshift#15234
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.