-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rebase to kube 1.7 on master #15234
rebase to kube 1.7 on master #15234
Conversation
I think the last bit of outstanding work is to open the upstream commits. |
@eparis @sttts @liggitt @smarterclayton Holy crap, fully reviewed and green! merge it quick! https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin/3203/ |
[testextended][extended:core(builds|templates)] |
Can we continue to get folks fixing things merged into this until we branch?
…On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 4:08 PM, OpenShift Bot ***@***.***> wrote:
continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/testextended Running (
https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_
request_origin_extended/862/) (Base Commit: 6c3acd2
<6c3acd2>)
(PR Branch Commit: ddc1938
<ddc1938>)
(Extended Tests: core(templates), core(builds))
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#15234 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABG_p3L-nkos-wTLKoEkbKiuOdqVSQYVks5sO78vgaJpZM4OZ-zJ>
.
|
@stevekuznetsov err:
? i'm going to just run one and then the other, but it seems like rosie didn't combine the focuses properly. |
@smarterclayton I'd rather not. This is green and trying to manually determine if their code can/should merge on mine isn't good from a review or stability perspective. People can create their own branches from here for merge after this. We could also move the branch up. I don't want to become Rosie on a psuedo-fork that periodically gets to rebase everyone's pulls on a new head. It's hard enough keeping this up to date already |
Let me rephrase this - have you made sure everyone whose code you disabled
who *isn't* working on 3.6 closeout knows they can now start using this to
test their fixes?
…On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 5:27 PM, David Eads ***@***.***> wrote:
@smarterclayton <https://github.com/smarterclayton> I'd rather not. This
is green and trying to manually determine if their code can/should merge on
mine isn't good from a review or stability perspective.
People can create their own branches from here for merge after this. We
could also move the branch up. I don't want to become Rosie on a
psuedo-fork that periodically gets to rebase everyone's pulls on a new
head. It's hard enough keeping this up to date already
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#15234 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABG_pzOm6psGwcWAA6bPcQx2iYRdaueUks5sO9G8gaJpZM4OZ-zJ>
.
|
@jim-minter looks like we have another case of using url parse that has been broken by golang 1.8. Think you can throw together a commit for @deads2k to cherry-pick here? (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin_extended/863/) |
e.serverThresholdCurrent.Set(float64(servers)) | ||
e.serverThresholdLimit.Set(float64(e.opts.ServerThreshold)) | ||
// TODO counters only go up | ||
// e.serverThresholdCurrent.Set(float64(servers)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can just make these gauges
Saw this in the logs:
GC or lost Mo's "disable TPR controller" commit? |
could also be storage cacher... not sure |
How are you tracking post-rebase (so I can add things) |
@smarterclayton post rebase todos: #14647 |
It didn't build. I've opened #15313 and I'll keep chasing it. |
[test] |
All the upstream 00000's have associated pulls. |
Evaluated for origin testextended up to 7d969d4 |
Evaluated for origin test up to 7d969d4 |
continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin/3233/) (Base Commit: 20e72f7) (PR Branch Commit: 7d969d4) |
continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/testextended FAILURE (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin_extended/868/) (Base Commit: 20e72f7) (PR Branch Commit: 7d969d4) (Extended Tests: core(builds|templates)) |
🎉 |
Picked commit from rebase to kube 1.7 Commit: cb0c13a PR: openshift#15234
Picked commit from rebase PR to kube 1.7 Commit: f39394b: handle printer changes PR: openshift#15234
Picked commit from rebase PR to kube 1.7 Commit: f39394b: handle printer changes PR: openshift#15234
Rebase branch on master. Original review of all commits completed in #15100
[test]