Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add gRPC client side metrics to apiservers #15517

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 28, 2017

Conversation

smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Better than nothing, even though this requires carries due to the vendoring of grpc under etcd.

We cannot access grpc inside the etcd tree, so we can't set dial options
normally. We probably want to converge on a gRPC version that matches
etcd rather than kubernetes for our server packages eventually.
Also has to be a carry because of the vendoring of etcd's gRPC and Kube
won't carry patches.
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 27, 2017
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

etcd3 has no default ootb metrics from kube, which is non-optimal. This gives us some visibility for now, we can improve in 3.7 (I'm going to wrap the etcd3 storage engine the same way as etcd2)

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

@deads2k hold your nose

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve no-issue

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 27, 2017
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

@liggitt

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

smarterclayton commented Jul 28, 2017

Actually let me make this a <drop>

@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor

liggitt commented Jul 28, 2017

wow, go makes things difficult. open issue upstream for making this better?

@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor

liggitt commented Jul 28, 2017

I don't really know what those dial options do... is there any chance we'd need to switch that off?

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

No, they just add interceptors that add GRPC metrics. Tiny risk, but none I can think of.

@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor

liggitt commented Jul 28, 2017

/lgtm then

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: liggitt, smarterclayton

Associated issue requirement bypassed by: smarterclayton

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:
  • OWNERS [liggitt,smarterclayton]

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

DaemonSet flake
/retest

@smarterclayton smarterclayton modified the milestone: 3.6.0 Jul 28, 2017
@smarterclayton smarterclayton added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 28, 2017
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: liggitt, smarterclayton

Associated issue requirement bypassed by: smarterclayton

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:
  • OWNERS [liggitt,smarterclayton]

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@smarterclayton smarterclayton merged commit e61626f into openshift:release-3.6 Jul 28, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants