-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Split up SDN master/node/proxy/CNI code #15781
Split up SDN master/node/proxy/CNI code #15781
Conversation
Looks clean to me. Squash the commits maybe to a recent date. A minor point that came up in my head: |
b9b597d
to
49f767c
Compare
/test extended_conformance_gce |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like this split. LGTM
LGTM |
49f767c
to
7ecb3e9
Compare
7ecb3e9
to
7a4ed1d
Compare
/retest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. This is great. Thank you.
I will say the right incantation on Monday to allow it to merge :-) |
7a4ed1d
to
4570e27
Compare
flake #15969 |
/lgtm |
/lgtm |
/approve
On Aug 29, 2017, at 12:57 PM, OpenShift Merge Robot < [email protected]> wrote:
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is *NOT APPROVED*
This pull-request has been approved by: *danwinship
<#15781#>*, *knobunc
<#15781 (comment)>*,
*pravisankar
<#15781 (comment)>*
We suggest the following additional approver: *smarterclayton*
Assign the PR to them by writing /assign @smarterclayton in a comment when
ready.
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here
<https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/blob/master/commands.md>.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:
- *hack/lib/OWNERS
<https://github.com/openshift/origin/blob/master/hack/lib/OWNERS>*
- *pkg/cmd/OWNERS
<https://github.com/openshift/origin/blob/master/pkg/cmd/OWNERS>*
- pkg/sdn/OWNERS
<https://github.com/openshift/origin/blob/master/pkg/sdn/OWNERS>
[danwinship,knobunc,pravisankar]
You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment
—
You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#15781 (comment)>,
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABG_p8-K83CukP07WxJG0v7Sb80l6Gviks5sdEMAgaJpZM4O3wVH>
.
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: danwinship, knobunc, pravisankar, smarterclayton The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:
You can indicate your approval by writing |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/test extended_conformance_install_update |
/retest |
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 15862, 15781, 15944) |
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 16054, 16057, 15440, 16028, 16055) Rename pkg/sdn to pkg/network, for consistency with its API @deads2k wanted this This is on top of #15781, but that should be merged soon. Only the last two commits ("Rename pkg/sdn to pkg/network, for consistency with its API" and "Regenerate files") are for this PR.
Right now
pkg/sdn/plugin
is a mix of code that runs on the master and code that runs on nodes. This splits things up. I think it makes sense? @openshift/networking what do you think?This gets rid of the
pkg/sdn/plugin
directory completely; node-specific code is now inpkg/sdn/node
because it doesn't actually use the network plugin API at all any more.