Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow template labels to be parameterised #16605

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2017

Conversation

jim-minter
Copy link
Contributor

@jim-minter jim-minter commented Sep 28, 2017

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 28, 2017
@jim-minter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bparees it just occurred to me, as this stands, this will allow label /values/ to be parameterised, but not label keys (or ${{json}}) - do you think either of these is warranted?

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Sep 28, 2017

@bparees it just occurred to me, as this stands, this will allow label /values/ to be parameterised, but not label keys (or ${{json}}) - do you think either of these is warranted?

allowing label keys to be parameterized is warranted imho. Supporting ${{}} syntax is not needed since label keys+values can only be strings anyway(right?)

@jim-minter
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@jim-minter
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@bparees bparees added this to the 3.8.0 milestone Oct 2, 2017
@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Oct 2, 2017

this will need a docs follow up too.

@jim-minter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bparees docs updated

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Oct 2, 2017

lgtm but holding for 3.8 since we are past feature cut on 3.7.

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Nov 9, 2017

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 9, 2017
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bparees, jim-minter

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 9, 2017
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Nov 14, 2017

/retest

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/test all [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jim-minter: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/openshift-jenkins/extended_conformance_install_update 6fd1097 link /test extended_conformance_install_update
ci/openshift-jenkins/cmd 6fd1097 link /test cmd
ci/openshift-jenkins/extended_conformance_gce 6fd1097 link /test extended_conformance_gce
ci/openshift-jenkins/extended_conformance_install 6fd1097 link /test extended_conformance_install

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 16605, 17270).

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 18d347d into openshift:master Nov 14, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Cannot use a template variable for a label
5 participants