Pull haproxy from the right place

[eparis]

This reverts the hack that we added to pull directly from a testing repo. Once the image rolls out to the mirrors the hack is not needed. This reverts it.

[knobunc]

/lgtm

Thanks @eparis

[eparis]

/lgtm cancel
since I have debug code in there...

[knobunc]

/hold

So I don't lgtm it again by mistake.

[eparis]

/lgtm
so we can just remove the hold :)

[openshift-ci-robot]

@eparis: you cannot LGTM your own PR.

In response to this:

/lgtm
so we can just remove the hold :)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[eparis]

stolen from #18073

[knobunc]

/lgtm

@eparis should I incorporate that in my test PR?

[smarterclayton]

Rebase this on my commit, we shouldn't be mixing the multi arch repo with the dependency repo.

[eparis]

All day, so much useless wheel spinning by me and @smarterclayton and this is what works.
/hold cancel
/lgtm

[openshift-ci-robot]

@eparis: you cannot LGTM your own PR.

In response to this:

All day, so much useless wheel spinning by me and @smarterclayton and this is what works.
/hold cancel
/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: eparis, knobunc

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

• images/base/OWNERS [eparis]
• images/router/OWNERS [eparis,knobunc]

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[eparis]

/retest

[eparis]

/retest

[eparis]

/retest

[smarterclayton]

lgtm

[smarterclayton]

/retest after AMI revert

…

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 2:20 PM, OpenShift CI Robot < ***@***.***> wrote: @eparis <https://github.com/eparis>: The following test *failed*, say /retest to rerun them all: Test name Commit Details Rerun command ci/openshift-jenkins/extended_conformance_install 90a1310 <90a1310> link <https://openshift-gce-devel.appspot.com/build/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/18066/test_pull_request_origin_extended_conformance_install/5430/> /test extended_conformance_install Full PR test history <https://openshift-gce-devel.appspot.com/pr/18066>. Your PR dashboard <https://openshift-gce-devel.appspot.com/pr/eparis>. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to <https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/flaky-tests.md#filing-issues-for-flaky-tests> an open issue <https://github.com/openshift/origin/issues?q=is:issue+is:open> when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here <https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/devel/pull-requests.md>. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra <https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:> repository. I understand the commands that are listed here <https://go.k8s.io/bot-commands>. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#18066 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABG_pynuunuUbvacemn8PaMlIBBfDDiaks5tJ7AFgaJpZM4Ra79k> .

[openshift-merge-robot]

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 18066, 18079).