-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[3.7] Drop image signature annotations #19078
[3.7] Drop image signature annotations #19078
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Michal Minář <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michal Minář <[email protected]>
/test |
I suppose origin 3.7 ci/cd is out of interest now. @bparees but we want to merge this anyway, right? |
generally we don't backport to old origin releases, but this is bad enough it would be nice to have it. And we certainly need the 3.7 CI working for the things that are important enough to backport, so paging @stevekuznetsov and @paradigm for the CI failure. |
@miminar: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bparees, miminar The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@miminar let's punt on this backport. it's not the sort of thing we normally backport to 3.7 and the CI system is broken. (If the CI system weren't broken i'd say let's merge it, but I don't want to deal w/ getting this through a broken merge queue) @smarterclayton how important is having CI work against older origin branches, to you? |
understood |
Backports #19037
Resolves: rhbz#1557607
/assign @bparees