Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

If --public-hostname is an IP, use it for server IP in cluster up #9103

Merged

Conversation

smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Otherwise users have no way to force a public IP.

@csrwng let me know if there's an alternative way you'd like to fix this. I guess it's possible users have a private server IP that they want to use, but they'd be no worse off than they are today.

@csrwng
Copy link
Contributor

csrwng commented Jun 1, 2016

Seems reasonable to me. LGTM
btw, aren't you supposed to be on pto :-) ?

@smarterclayton smarterclayton force-pushed the use_public_hostname_as_ip branch from d38586a to 0b992a2 Compare June 1, 2016 02:31
Otherwise users have no way to force a public IP.
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

[merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[Test]ing while waiting on the merge queue

@csrwng
Copy link
Contributor

csrwng commented Jun 1, 2016

looks like image stream wasn't imported in time
[merge]

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

[merge]

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

[test]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin test up to 0b992a2

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test FAILURE (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/4340/)

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

[merge]

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:55 AM, OpenShift Bot [email protected]
wrote:

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge FAILURE (
https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/4343/)


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#9103 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ABG_p-iQ74726SaDZe1I4l4eqvcrm9dNks5qHn5bgaJpZM4IrHmm
.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jun 2, 2016

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/4390/) (Image: devenv-rhel7_4304)

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jun  2 13:31:50.045: INFO: stderr: ""
Jun  2 13:31:50.045: INFO: Unknown output type: . Skipping.
Jun  2 13:31:50.045: INFO: Waiting up to 1m0s for all nodes to be ready
STEP: Destroying namespace "e2e-tests-services-t2i03" for this suite.
E0602 13:33:41.214662    9968 iowatcher.go:109] Unable to decode an event from the watch stream: net/http: request canceled (Client.Timeout exceeded while reading body)
Jun  2 13:36:50.079: INFO: Pod e2e-tests-services-t2i03 hostexec on node 172.18.13.111 remains, has deletion timestamp 2016-06-02 13:32:20 -0400 EDT
Jun  2 13:36:50.079: FAIL: Couldn't delete ns "e2e-tests-services-t2i03": namespace e2e-tests-services-t2i03 was not deleted within limit: timed out waiting for the condition, pods remaining: [hostexec]


• Failure in Spec Teardown (AfterEach) [353.890 seconds]
[k8s.io] Services
/data/src/github.com/openshift/origin/Godeps/_workspace/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.go:420
  should be able to create a functioning NodePort service [AfterEach]
  /data/src/github.com/openshift/origin/Godeps/_workspace/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/service.go:404

This looks similar to failures we were seeing in the upstream suite, where the watch was getting terminated due to another failure, but we didn't catch / handle it correctly.

[merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin merge up to 0b992a2

@openshift-bot openshift-bot merged commit b42bfc3 into openshift:master Jun 2, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants