Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

clean up jenkins master/slave example #9956

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 21, 2016

Conversation

bparees
Copy link
Contributor

@bparees bparees commented Jul 20, 2016

@bparees bparees force-pushed the jenkins_slave_service branch 4 times, most recently from 32781fd to 680dd7c Compare July 20, 2016 18:43
@bparees bparees force-pushed the jenkins_slave_service branch from 680dd7c to 717a0bd Compare July 20, 2016 19:14
@bparees
Copy link
Contributor Author

bparees commented Jul 20, 2016

@gabemontero ptal

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

lgtm

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor Author

bparees commented Jul 21, 2016

[merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jul 21, 2016

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/6632/) (Image: devenv-rhel7_4640)

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin merge up to 717a0bd

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[Test]ing while waiting on the merge queue

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin test up to 717a0bd

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/6632/)

@openshift-bot openshift-bot merged commit 31aa001 into openshift:master Jul 21, 2016
@bparees bparees deleted the jenkins_slave_service branch July 24, 2016 23:13
@tdawson
Copy link
Member

tdawson commented Aug 1, 2016

This has been merged and is in OSE v3.3.0.13 or newer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants