-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.17] OCPBUGS-50564: UPSTREAM: 129180: prevent unnecessary resolving of iscsi/fc devices to dm #2203
base: release-4.17
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: the contents of this pull request could be automatically validated. The following commits are valid:
Comment |
/cherry-pick release-4.16 |
@RomanBednar: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.15 |
@RomanBednar: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-46038 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-50564. Will retitle bug to link to clone. WARNING: Failed to update the target version, assignee, and sprint for the clone. Please update these fields manually. Full error below: Full error message.
customfield_12319940 - Field 'customfield_12319940' cannot be set. It is not on the appropriate screen, or unknown.: request failed. Please analyze the request body for more details. Status code: 400:
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-50564, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
cc @bertinatto For review - this is a backport of #2171. In upstream I could go up to 1.29 only since 1.28 is already out of support. Downstream we need this in 4.15. 4.18 has been already rebased and included this patch here so remaining branches are 4.17, 4.16, 4.15. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bertinatto, openshift-cherrypick-robot The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
@RomanBednar: Can not set label backport-risk-assessed: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-staff-engineers] In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
cc @chao007 for approval |
/jira refresh |
@RomanBednar: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-50564, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@RomanBednar: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-50564, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #2171
/assign RomanBednar